Review Tales
Book Magazine – Publishing – Editing
Why should we not have books and scriptures censored? – Written By Boringbug
Boringbug is a blogger, a sketch artist by hobby and a lawyer. He writes to pen his vague ideas and experiences in different forms. His website Boringbug is a part reflection of his ideas, experiences, dialogues, thoughts and opinions.
WHY SHOULD WE NOT HAVE BOOKS AND SCRIPTURES CENSORED?
Censorship is defined as a suppression or prohibition of any part of a book, film, news, idea, speech, content, etc. that is considered obscene, politically & ideologically unacceptable, a threat to security, or is offensive towards a group of people. It is generally performed upon an establishment consisting of ideas, visuals, rhetoric, etc. that is based upon a certain view on life. The mass burning of books, the banning of books in countries, removal of chapters, etc. from course books, are some prime examples of censorship of books.
The idea of censorship on books is not a new concept. A person at the helm of power decides on a whim as to what part and content of a book should be read and what part should be censored. In recent times, it has been applied to books in order to avoid the adult base content being read by children, and in general to avoid political contradictions.
The argument that children, if exposed to a book not suitable for their age group, would yield hampering results does not persist. In my view, if anyone wants to know about suitability of books for children, generally the synopsis and reviews provide plenty of clues. As far as a child is concerned, he might have difficulty interpreting the heavy content of a book which is beyond his comprehensive ability. In fact, if he is able to comprehend, then age is merely a number for the child. The only factor separating the child from the objectionable content is good guidance and mentoring. After all, he may not be able to absorb the content as deep as he might while watching a visual.
The above analogy can be rebutted on psychological aspect. It is an established fact that what is read is more difficult to visualise than what is seen. In the Spinozian sense, you cannot visualise or imagine anything that is not present in nature and is not seen before. (natura naturata). We respond and learn faster from visuals rather than from reading. Hence this justifies why there is a censor board for visuals or movies.
I would rather clarify that I am talking about censoring of books/ novels/ scriptures etc. (written material) in layman term. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion that includes the censoring authorities in their political mindset.
Let us return back to why books and/or scriptures should not be censored? The censor board is for visuals which are telecasted all over a state; at the very least, novels are not televised. Unless they are books with visuals, such as a manga or comic books, people will remain benevolent towards the aspect of reading and will not imagine absurd graphics since they would not know how it came to be! However, this idea is again questionable, since humans cannot escape their nature and their natural tendencies.
I say that after a certain point humans are bound to learn certain things. Censoring the same in the name of absurdities such as sin would result in the collapse of society. While visuals show it, books portray it. Reading brings maturity and clarity of thought. This is because we need to read enough to augment rational thoughts. Irrespective of the genre, reading helps us develop logical reasoning. Reading a book and censoring the politically explicit part would be a resultant breach of one’s personal right.
I am of a profound opinion that there should not be any censorship or limitation on books. After all, a person sitting on a chair cannot determine as to what one should and should not read. Information is power; to allow those already in power to censor the opinions of those who disagree with their views is unhealthy and potentially dangerous. We cannot judge and censor an opinion on the mere connotation that it is contrary to our belief.
Boringbug is a blogger, a sketch artist by hobby and a lawyer. He writes to pen his vague ideas and experiences in different forms. His website Boringbug is a part reflection of his ideas, experiences, dialogues, thoughts and opinions.
14 Comments on “Why should we not have books and scriptures censored? – Written By Boringbug”
Leave a Reply
Review Tales 
Pingback: Why should we not have books and scriptures censored? -By Boringbug – Review Tales – A Personal & Sincere Review On Books Read
Thank you Jeyran. I am humbly pleased by the response.
LikeLike
Thank you for writing so well
LikeLike
I think the last paragraph got repeated.
LikeLike
I don’t see it where?
LikeLike
The line from the second last paragraph onward “I am of a profound opinion that there should not be any censorship or limitation on books. After all, a person sitting on a chair cannot determine …” .
LikeLike
I was looking at your other post! just shows how tired I am from working today. I fixed it now. Is everything else okay?
LikeLike
Haha. Someone just pointed it out for me. It’s perfect.
I hope you get some rest. 🙂
LikeLike
I will finish work at 5 and then probably try not to do anything else. The long weekend is coming so I am looking forward to that too.
LikeLike
Wait,you don’t mean 5.00 a.m. right?
LikeLike
lol no 5 pm
LikeLike
Pingback: The Art of Deception: The Rich v/s the Poor Debate – Written by Boringbug – Review Tales – A Personal & Sincere Review On Books Read
Beautifully written. I read some classic books as a child that were probably way beyond my maturity level. I don’t remember “getting” the more adult stuff or being disturbed like I would have with a violent film, but I DO remember being inspired to think and imagine.
LikeLike
Censorship is an author’s worst enemy.
LikeLiked by 1 person